20 Quick Lessons to No-BS Self-Protection
January 20, 2009 – 3:00 amAs one who lived within violence and terror from childhood due to a special array of circumstances including physical and mental childhood disabilities, I dedicated my life to becoming “invisible.” Fighting back never worked for me as it only exacerbated the problem, leading to a worse ambush later. I didn’t want to fight. I wanted to be left alone, unmolested and unharmed.
When it comes to preparing yourself to deal with a violent attack, I advocate a doctrine of “unconditional survival.” Due to the inherent educational flaws in the American “martial art” approach, I assembled this desideratum to fill the gap between the technique-oriented training most Americans undergo in the dojo and the reality of the violent personal attacks.

If you intend to take a self-defense or martial arts course, none of what you read should be interpreted as an admonition to abandon that supplementary education. In the contrary, my list will help you make what you already know more accessible and effective should you ever find yourself in a suddenly violent situation.
- In any physical conflict, your goal is unconditional survival. It is not to kill an assailant, nor to maim, injure or hurt him, for those are merely byproducts of pursuing your objective, which is freedom from harm - physical, mental and emotional. You must always hold true to your goal: to survive unconditionally, without question, at any cost. That does not include fighting; it does include appropriate application of fighting skill at the decisive moment.
- If you do not need to employ your physical skills or defense tools (like mace, a knife or a gun) or if you need to refrain from using them, they should remain invisible. Since the goal of an assailant is to remove opportunities for you to defend yourself, only if you are attacked should you allow others to be aware of your ability or options.
- By themselves, prearranged martial arts techniques are insufficient for self-protection. Unconditional survival demands extensive skill and preparation ranging from non-verbal communication to lethal force. Basically, if your only tool is a hammer, everything you see will be a nail (which means you’ll stimulate more conflict, not less.) If you understand only fighting skill, then when conflict arises you will fight, even if the situation could have been solved by other means. To become truly invisible to violence, you must have a spectrum of tools to defuse aggression.
- Symmetrical training, like sparring, cannot be relied upon. Too many martial arts instructors teach you how to use your skills only against practitioners of the same style. More importantly, when you’re attacked it’s never with mutual consent; no bowing, squaring off, mental preparation for the bell, and gentlemanly rules. An ambush (being asymmetrical) has little to no resemblance to a sparring match. You should find “role model” scenario-based training to supplement any martial art training you choose to do.
- Training should not involve any preconceived ideas about saving face or fighting fair. Survival is not about style, but about the reality of evasion and escape. Lie, cheat, wreak whatever chicanery necessary. Do everything possible to protect yourself and extract yourself from harm’s way. Even the courts indemnify you from this in your right to self-preservation. Withdraw when you can. It may be your most successful tactic and can save your life. In a fight, you will be lucky to leave unscathed, so if you can avoid the fight, do so at all costs. Violence avoided is a fight won.

- The key to survival does not lie in memorizing a couple quotes from Eastern philosophy, slapping a few flashy kicks and submission holds together, and starting a new style. The key to survival involves uncovering your own self-worth and truly believing that you have a valuable contribution to the world which deserves protecting.
- You must be prepared, both psychologically and physiologically, for the attack. Your awareness must be such that you have the ability to function under the intense strain of personal violence even though it will enable you to defuse or avoid 90 percent of all volatile situations. Your would-be assailant interviews you as a potential “safe” victim for him to attack; and you want your awareness to be sufficiently prepared so that you FAIL this interview!
- If you fail to recognize the attack developing and are startled by it, you will not have access to your skills. If you allow your awareness to lapse and fade, you will become a victim of your own overconfidence. Violence starts much earlier than the physical manifestation of the attack. You must have complete training for detecting the pre-attack indicators so that you can avoid, prevent or distract violence before it unfolds. That can mean feigning submission and acquiescing to the demands of the assailant. Give up your wallet or purse; its contents do not equal your life or the life of a loved one.
- Don’t spend all your training time in the dojo. Miyamoto Musashi, one of the greatest warrior-philosophers, stated in his Book of Five Rings: … “If you learn indoor techniques, you will think narrowly and forget the true way. Thus you will have difficulty in actual encounters.” True martial art begins when you leave your class, not when you enter it.
- Martial sports are about technical skill, steadfastness, endurance, doggedness, durability and resilience. They have nothing to do with personal violence because they do not take place outdoors, in the dirt, in the rain, in the snow, on the concrete or in ambush simulations. Competing in combat sports can supplement your ability to defend yourself, but cannot replace it.

- Most people have never fallen on anything harder than a mat. They have never kicked with their shoes on or punched a real person. They have probably not tried to battle from inside a vehicle, from within a crowd of civilians or in the company of untrained loved ones. Don’t fall victim to those pitfalls.
- To prepare for an event, you must simulate it as closely as possible. Performance is in direct proportion to preparation. Moreover, the worst performance you have in training is the best you can hope for in combat. To increase your chance of survival, you must engage in overload practice. Your training simulations must be more difficult than the potential assault.
- Merely because something is old does not mean it is valuable today. Ancient training methods are an excellent way of learning how people fought and trained in ancient times. Back then, people trained in unarmed fighting because oppressive rulers restricted weapons possession. Some ancient fighting methods are no longer effective because the 21st century has brought a new kind of threat. The assailant which confronts you is a new breed of felon more terrorist than criminal who feeds on the emotional trauma he inflicts.
- Because of the weapons and methods used by modern criminals, you can no longer permit yourself the luxury of training only with your empty hands. You ought to adopt an integrated system that spans the continuum of defensive preparation, from non-verbal communication to interpersonal skill to less-than-lethal measures (like mace) to lethal force (included edged weapons and firearms.)
- Its time to fight when the situation is no longer acceptable to you. Rarely do you have to fight. Rarely do you encounter a situation that is truly unacceptable. The obstacle is not that you fail to choose to fight, for it is not a choice but a fact that when something is unacceptable to you, you will act upon it in some form. The failure comes in realizing too late, and then you are playing “catch-up” with your very life, when you are surprised or not properly prepared with a flexible and comprehensive self-protection doctrine, you are not given the opportunity to enter the fight. If so, your actions may be inappropriate or insufficient. Anyone can successfully negotiate personal violence as long as he is given the ability to act appropriately.

- What gives you the ability to survive is training within a doctrine that permits you to identify and assess a threat prior to the fight, one that derails psychological and physiological factors that inhibit your entrance into the fight, one that affords you access to your fighting skill should physical violence break out, and one that provides post-combat knowledge to address legal, medical and social concerns.
- Your capacity for calmly recognizing an assailants probing process will determine your ability to survive. There are certain characteristics that are common to all attacks and certain brands of behavior common to particular types of belligerents. The attacker’s interview phase is one of these characteristics, where he is determining if you’re “safe” to attack. If you do not possess the calm repose and wherewithal to recognize that violence begins long before the fight, you will not have access to your fighting skill. If you fail to recognize the development of the attack, you may be able to muster the ability to do something about fighting, when prevention may have been the most effective solution.
- Self-protection is not about fighting; it is about awareness and commitment. Awareness of your options and the composition of confrontation increases your survivability. Non-verbal training, eye and facial calibration, body carriage, postural and spatial constitution, gesticulation and verbal skill should be critical parts of your training.
- During a physical confrontation that has obvious legal implications, the fight is over when the assailant is no longer a threat, even though the turmoil continues until the situation is resolved legally, socially, physically and emotionally. The law never supercedes your right to self-preservation. The legal system was created to perpetuate your survival, not inhibit or endanger it.
- You should endeavor to end physical confrontation as quickly as possible. Keep your response simple and expedient. You do not have the luxury of being complex, especially in multiple-assailant engagements. Most of the time, you can end the problem by simply unbalancing your adversary and withdrawing tactically.
Fighting is something you do with someone; violence is something done to someone. Nothing you’ve ever done in your life, intentionally or accidentally, merits a suddenly violent attack to your person. Do not try to fight. You only have the impulse to fight, because you’re a good person, because psychologically, you believe in fairness and righteousness. Sudden violence is neither.
Believe in yourself, in your intrinsic goodness, and protect that essence as you would your own child, unconditionally.

Flow Thyself™,











10 Responses to “20 Quick Lessons to No-BS Self-Protection”
Scott,
Thank you for cutting past all the self defense BS out there. I wish more self defense instructors would teach the principles above. I’m sure that many refrain because makes the act of survival MUCH harder to teach when it involves more than rote technique. And of course, you cannot bring someone in training where you have not gone yourself.
Surviving a violent encounter, much like surviving disease, is best handled with prevention rather than treatment. Of course, there are times when treatment/fighting is the last and only option.
Best regards,
John Sifferman
By John Sifferman on Jan 20, 2009
This is absolute gold, Coach.
I set out to make several detailed comments, but the further I read the more obvious it became that I could relate an incident from my experience which validated each of your points.
Anyone remotely serious about self-protection should study this, and modify their training accordingly.
By Ryan Murdock on Jan 20, 2009
hello,
coach sonnon, with any luck, none of these folks will ever have to go through this.
here’s hopin’.
thanks
By lorenzo damarith on Jan 20, 2009
Coach Sonnon ,what a prescient article of what has been an academic and professional concern of mine for a number of years. Your twenty points regarding self-defense (or as popularized in today’s martial arts industry as reality-based self-defense) should be covered in say a Black Belt Magazine article, such as a Jim Wagner column or something along the line of Tony Blauer or Loren D. Christensen book or video. I could not agree more with the gist of your article. For a number of years, I have studied and dedicated to myself to a martial art from Korea called Ho Kuk Mu Sul (think Hapkido with the Tae Kwon Do striking thrown in), an ancient art with a long history in Korean martial lore. I love my art and practice it diligently, but what I learn in the dojang (or dojo) -and this is self-defense oriented martial art; Ho Kuk Mu Sul can be roughly translated as “martial self-defense skill of Korea” - which amounts to over 165 self-defense techniques by the time you receive your black belt, I’d never use in a sudden, violent street situation, unless of course I’m attacked by a cooperative perpetrator. That is, he leads with a back punch followed by a front kick, I step a foot back, parry the kick….and so on. Every technique we learn in class is sequenced and on rote. The attacker is always in cue with that of the defender and does nothing more or less than what the technique is choreographed. I know better to think that a ’street’ confrontation will result in dojo sequencing of events. What I learn on the mat gives me body-mechanics, an enhanced agility you might say, and hopefully an increased confidence
in my abilities to determine the best fight or flight response.
I have a wonderful sensei who likes to mix our classes up by having the ‘attacker’ mix it up, that is, not to use the rote attack sequence, and dare I say, you must witness the ensuing chaos of the confounded student defender. Everything they’ve learned is lost or in turmoil. What is seen by the outsider as a beautiful self-defense art form becomes a flailing clumsiness.
For twenty years, I co-directed a summer camp for international students
studying English as a second language at U.C. Berkeley. Another co-director who is a Berkeley police officer and was a self-defense instructor for their crowd-control squads and SWAT team and I decided that a lot of the students were naive in their street awareness knowledge, especially for the urban environment and through the summer camp program we set up a street awareness and self-defense program. 90% of what we taught was avoidance and composure skills, the body language skills you write about. The where not to go knowledge so important for unknowing and unawares visitors to the U.S. We both knew that the actual martial skills needed to survive any confrontation or mugging could not be passed on in a Class101 format. To the young woman students, we might suggest that they carry pepper spray or mace, but more importantly we tried to convey to them the necessary street or neighborhood knowledge that will lessen confrontations.
I, myself, have been mugged in the past (in Boston). Everything I had learned in my study of Tae Kwon Do in those days was not even attempted. I went beserk and crazy and a broken car antenna became my situation control device and I fortunate that the attacker panicked and fled.
This article shall be reread a number of times and meditated upon. I will send it off to a number of martial arts involved friends of mine, including the above mentioned police officer who like Coach Joseph Wilson is a proud owner of a successful martial arts academy. Thank You for this very timely and sober article.
By Kevin Dougherty on Jan 20, 2009
A really excellent article as usual. I especially liked the way it touched on things that most really Really GOOD self defense courses don’t, like “you have to believe that you’re worth defending”. There aren’t many who even realize those things are important.
There were only a couple things that could stand a little bit of rewriting.
The part about simulation having to be more difficult than the reality is absolutely true. There are people who will read it in a simple-minded way without understanding the gradual build-up that you use in your training methods. And a few more will substitute “dangerous” for “difficult” or “traumatic” for “getting comfortable with being uncomfortable” if they don’t have a good example to work from.
The other part is the new terroristic breed of felon. I’m not sure if it’s actually true. There have always been bullies and sadistic S.O.B.s who enjoy hurting people. We could sacrifice lots of innocent electrons on the subject which I don’t really want to do.
The question is how important is it?
Prison psychiatrists have these guys on the couch for years and can’t tell if someone’s an opportunistic criminal, a sadistic criminal, an economic criminal or some other kind of criminal. It’s hard enough trying to make sure he’s “avoided criminal”, “deterred criminal”, “fleeing criminal” or “incapacitated criminal”.
And here’s something I think we can all agree on (warning: NSFW language)….
http://www.spike.com/video/british-kung-fu/2773496
By Todd Ellner on Jan 22, 2009
Thank you again Coach. Another article that proves why you are one of the few respectable people in the often wacky world of fitness/martial arts. Some of the points made in the article are exactly the reasons why I turned away from martial arts training as an adult.
The only missing point being that, considering what you brought up, the financial cost of martial arts training renders it a luxury (especially in today’s economy), sometimes less practical than even taking a dance class – which if you’re the average guy will get you farther than breaking a brick with your head. (If that seems a far off comparison, I defer to the modern day performances of the legendary Shaolin Monks… especially on recent shows like NBC’s “Superstars of Dance”)
Question
Is there a book, system, etc. that you would recommend for appropriate training (if there is such a thing), especially for the psychological & physiological ways to possibly avoid such violence (i.e. make yourself less of a mark)?
By Alex on Jan 23, 2009
I’ve got a question about:
“If you do not need to employ your physical skills or defense tools (like mace, a knife or a gun) or if you need to refrain from using them, they should remain invisible.”
When my wife walks to her car at night, she’s got her mace in her hand. Displaying it for all to see. Isn’t this a good thing? I would think an attacker would pass her over and select another, more susceptible, target. As horrible as that sounds, she needs to get home safely, not clean up the streets.
Thanks for the fantastic post.
Dan
By Dan Williams on Jan 23, 2009
Coach Sonnon,
I hope you don’t mind, but I’ve posted links to this on a few of the more popular martial arts sites. It’s stuff that people need to hear and mostly never do. So far the responses have been very positive.
By Todd Ellner on Jan 23, 2009
Todd and all, thanks for the comments. BTW: the “more terrorist than criminal” was an allusion to a study done in 1999 over 20 years of knife attack statistics demonstrating the increased number of stab wounds and deliberately-painful-but-not-mortal location of wounding. I can dig up the study when I get the time, if you want.
Alex, hard question. For understanding the psychology of attack, Tony Blauer, Geoff Thompson, Tim Larkin, et al. However, I view violence from both an anthropological and an energetic perspective. My physical approach derives from my childhood imperative of being left alone (rather than retaliation), and in not being detected, rather than “one to be avoided.” I presume this is why the universe guided me to eventually train with the Russian Spetsnaz, in that they were in a peculiar position of not only intending to not be discovered, but also to not be “burned” (exposed as Spetsnaz) by appearing to be regular military if discovered.
Dan, this plays into your question. My approach is different than most… consider it to be a combination of my childhood experiences and my young adulthood fighting experiment with my adult immersion with the Spetsnaz.
My goal is to be at least one step less visible than the least visible person in a group. I don’t “blip” on an attacker’s radar, not because I’m someone to be avoided, but because I’m neither valuable, nor ostensibly unaware. I wouldn’t consider myself physically intimidating (like most Spetsnaz appeared to be no more physically imposing than say a rock climber.) I don’t want to be, because that blips on the radar.
Attackers not only look for the weak. They’re specifically conditioned to look for weakness. That’s a critical distinction. If you appear highly visible in your “strengths” aggressors don’t necessarily pass you for a weaker prey, because they’re looking for your weakness - let’s call it they’re vocational necessity or at least curiosity.
If you’re visibly wearing a martial arts jacket, carrying a can of OC spray, even wearing a badge and sporting holster… you’ve just given your assailant exactly what he needs to avoid.
In my audio, the Flow-State Performance Spiral, I talk about the progression from Intention to Opportunity to Ability. It also works in reverse for those who “intend to be avoided” by their brandishing of overt tactical defensiveness.
Your wife’s assailant doesn’t need to worry about the OC spray, because he knows exactly where it is. It’s the first opportunity that he’ll remove. Unfortunately for most people, they place all of the “eggs in one basket” - and only have one or at best two defensive opportunities, which if visible are easily bracketed.
The goal that my approach has comes from a perspective of not wanting my strengths to be known. Of course, I don’t pretend to be weak. But I neither disclose my strengths. (Few people would even guess how fast I can run…)
Thanks for such fantastic responses everyone! Is this the type of blog that you would like to read more often? If so, I can try to focus more attention to this topic since so many are really interested!
Flow Thyself™,
By Scott Sonnon on Jan 23, 2009
I’d really appreciate looking at that study. Most of what one finds without access to expensive academic journals is summary statistics like the UCR and NCVS or personal anecdotes. And that just doesn’t give real insight sometimes. If “stick don’t cut” has made a comeback that’s worth knowing, especially compared to shooting statistics.
Your “less visible” is an important point. Being not invisible but just unremarkable and easy to overlook is a difficult but useful skill. One of the many wonderful things about meeting Cliff Stewart was seeing how a very good professional bodyguard carries himself. You wouldn’t think your eyes could slide past a man that big when he’s standing all alone in the middle of a wrestling gym.
By Todd Ellner on Jan 24, 2009