James Boelter
01-31-2004, 02:42 AM
Bill, in your capsule summary, it says you've been both a yoga teacher and a martial arts instructor. I'm curious as to how you proceeded in your incorporation of these two 'modes' of movement and being, since it seems as if yoga isn't the 'best' GPP for martial arts (lots better than nothing, of course), and both arts are intensive disciplines that require sustained, concentrated effort to advance to a 'teacher/instructor' level. (I practiced Bikram Yoga, which is essentially ONE routine, pretty hard for a couple of years, but I was nowhere near ready to be a teacher, for instance, and I had a LOT more conditioning background and experience than most of the people in the classes).
I read somewhere that one of the Gracie brothers (I think Royce) is very advanced in hatha yoga, and uses pranayama breathing practices to help deal with the stress and strain of UFC competition, so the idea is not outlandish by any means, but the Gracies are extraordinary in many respects, plus they are 'full time pros'. What works for them may not work for a 40+ middle class male recently 'sprung' from the professional corporate IT treadmill.
Was it a sequential series of evolutionary steps - first one, and then, when it wasn't 'quite enough', then the other? Or did you grow in both simultaneously, finding enough complementary/supplementary aspects in each art to florish in both?
How this applies to me is; I desperately want to return to some serious practice of Hsing I and Pa Kua once I am certified to slap bodies for a living :lol: , but I miss the way Bikram made me feel like a million bucks...plus I feel that teaching the Bikram style (easy to learn, but a bitch-kitty to master) would be a valuable contribution to the health and well being of many, many clients...whereas Pa Kua is pretty much for the Hard Core...it would be pretty much for my own benefit and satisfaction.
Can you do both? Should you do both? If you had it to do over again, would you have lessened or omitted your involvement in one or the other?
I would appreciate your thoughts and perspective!
I read somewhere that one of the Gracie brothers (I think Royce) is very advanced in hatha yoga, and uses pranayama breathing practices to help deal with the stress and strain of UFC competition, so the idea is not outlandish by any means, but the Gracies are extraordinary in many respects, plus they are 'full time pros'. What works for them may not work for a 40+ middle class male recently 'sprung' from the professional corporate IT treadmill.
Was it a sequential series of evolutionary steps - first one, and then, when it wasn't 'quite enough', then the other? Or did you grow in both simultaneously, finding enough complementary/supplementary aspects in each art to florish in both?
How this applies to me is; I desperately want to return to some serious practice of Hsing I and Pa Kua once I am certified to slap bodies for a living :lol: , but I miss the way Bikram made me feel like a million bucks...plus I feel that teaching the Bikram style (easy to learn, but a bitch-kitty to master) would be a valuable contribution to the health and well being of many, many clients...whereas Pa Kua is pretty much for the Hard Core...it would be pretty much for my own benefit and satisfaction.
Can you do both? Should you do both? If you had it to do over again, would you have lessened or omitted your involvement in one or the other?
I would appreciate your thoughts and perspective!