PDA

View Full Version : Mobility vs. Flexibility



Scott Sonnon
05-30-2004, 08:20 AM
Mobility vs. Flexibility

Mobility practice is a daily requirement, whereas flexibility training is not. Mobility practice provides nutritive and lubricative fluid to wash each joint (which it would not happen without doing so), reversing the aging-process. Flexibility training does not do this.

Dr. Nikolay Amosov, a well-respected Russian surgeon, supported the notion of mobility practice with his "1000 moves to Heaven." Dr. Amosov completely rehabilitated from open heart surgery with mobility practice (including with light weight movements, you find in light Clubbell training). Furthermore, Dr. Asomov claimed that he reversed his aging process through this mobility practice.

Your ability to move through all 3 dimensions (front/back, top/bottom, right/left - the "6 Degrees of Freedom") is absolutely requisite to the health of your joints - and we are as old as our joints! Injuries and general wear-and-tear cause joint compression (squeezing out "Synovial fluid" - your joint's nutrition and lubrication), create scar tissue (called "adhesions") and calcium deposits ("joint salts") as well as rheumatoid ailments. Your mobility practice decompresses your joints washing them with nutritive and lubricative health while breaking up adhesions and calcium deposits so you can continue to move pain-free for the rest of your life. Flexibility training cannot do this, since it moves against tissue tension in one direction.

Flexible Instability - Mobile Stability

You can consider the primary distinction between mobility practice and flexibility training, your percentage likelihood of injury. In other words, possessing good flexibility without mobility predisposes you to injury! Physiologically, you'll be much safer slightly tight with good mobility, than very loose with inadequate mobility.

I see many injuries in martial arts related to concentration on flexibility and neglect of mobility. Mobility practice improves strength and stability in the extreme ranges of motion of your joints, whereas flexibility training (without mobility) decreases strength and stability.

Mobility - the Anti-Aging Agent

Mobility practice is more important for not only athletic performance, but also for anti-aging. Warrior Wellness is most often used for a morning (afternoon and evening) super-charge, as well as a warm-up for more strenuous activities like Clubbell swinging. Another important use for mobility practice is as an "active recovery" session or cycle when you don't want to train strenuously.

Flexibility on the other hand regards the elasticity of the tissues. With conventional flexibility training you use static stretching (with the help of gravity, a partner or object leverage to increase length.

Mobility (also called "Dynamic Flexibility" training - though I dislike this term) regards movement (not position) into the extreme range of motion of each joint through voluntary muscular control (and after a healthy foundation, includes light Clubbell work with inertia, gravity and leverage.)

Unlike you would find in flexibility training, in mobility practice you don't try to hold an extreme position, but rather you pass through it slowly and smoothly without forcing the tissues to deform, but rather by allowing the muscles to relax voluntarily.

When to use Flexibility Training?

If one insists on flexibility training, then I suggest "active contraction release" (a type of PNF type of) stretching. Although very rigorous, it will improve strength. However, since it is so demanding, only perform this type of training at the end of the day, after all other activities conclude. I've used flexibility training after mobility practice to help me strengthen specific weak points in a full range of motion.

Stretching vs. Yoga vs. Body-Flow

Hatha yoga asana (positions or poses), static stretching training and Body-Flow (http://www.rmax.tv/bodyflow.html) (dynamic mobility training, including courses such as Warrior Wellness (http://www.rmax.tv/warrior.html) and Be Breathed (http://www.rmax.tv/bebreathed.html)) are three different agendas. The people whom find the most difficulty learning yoga for instance comprise the most flexible; the same is true in Body-Flow. The common Western misunderstanding is that yoga is "just stretching," when in reality it is the opposite; stretching moves against the tension to deform the tissues, whereas yoga asanas breathes into the tension to allow it to relax while simultaneously providing stabilizing strengthening.

I view hatha yoga asana as a means of surrendering tension through breathing and focus to augment mobility practice. As such, I use asana when I encounter a range of motion in my Body-Flow practice which holds considerable blockage and limitation. I move into the asana to release the tension and as a result allow me to amplify my Body-Flow.

It's important to not associate conventional static stretching with hatha yoga asana. For the difference between Body-Flow and Hatha Yoga read: the Body-Flow Answer to the Yoga Riddle (http://www.circularstrengthmag.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=49#49).

Robert V
06-01-2004, 08:37 PM
Guys,

I truly believe this is one of the most important pieces Mr. Sonnon has ever written.

This consumes one of the biggest misconceptions in health and conditioning.

I personally "saved" it and put it on my desktop, to read again, again and re-read.

I knew this and I could communicate it to a certain degree, but Scott clarified it as only he can, with thorough research, knowledge and practice.

Why am I creating so much fuss over this piece? Well, I believe it's the cornerstone of CST. This is where it all begins.

Also, I believe some are not quite clear why they are doing these little effortless circular motions and unique acrobatics and call it "training" , when they have been conditioned to think very narrowly when it comes to "stretching". "Thank you, HS "gym" teachers. We would of really appreciated true "physical educators".

The learning process is deepened when the student has "meaningful learning". That is when the student truly knows intellectual "why" of the task they've been ask to complete.

This is why I call my what I do a "workshop" instead of a typical "class". I want them to connect the knowledge to the task and the task to the knowledge.

I believe if you intellectually ingest the above information, there will be a direct connection with your progression. I'd use it as a springboard to do my own research on movement, mobility, flexibility, range of motion, anatomy, yoga and tension.

Another reason I'm so adamant about this post is because I'm alway bombarded with the question of "flexibility". They ask, "will I become more flexible if I take your class?" To answer the question correctly, I have to give them a micro-workshop.

Most of use have sufficient "static" flexibility. But we are not statues, we move. Therefore, we need a system that will assist our "mobility". Its "tension" that is most responsible for limiting our movement. We have to find the source of that tension when we are static for improved static flexibility and we have to find that tension in motion, to improve our mobility.

As Mr. Sonnon has explained before, "true flexibility" involves coordination, balance/agility and strength also. It's impossible to get that when you are not moving.

So often, I get people in my class that say, "I'm already flexible". I then give them a "BME" from bodyflow or WW and they are simply befuddled!

Scott, thank you for this gift.

Robert