PDA

View Full Version : Symphonic Movement



Pattimeow
06-05-2004, 09:29 PM
Hi all,

Over on the CST list (Circular Strength Training) I was talking about how 5 minutes of CST movement after each meal felt silly to me. First of all I could not see any difference between exercise and movement, and if it wasn’t a good long at least 30 minute workout (to burn calories and such), then why even bother? Then Scott (CST coach) said this:

“Exercise and movement health are not synonymous (actually in the conventional fitness industry they’re often contradictory!). You need to clean the slate before beginning, and you need to do that incrementally. Movement health incrementally builds into “exercise” but in a way that is concrete, idiosyncratic and health-sustainable.”

As I thought on this I started to see an analogy that fit it perfectly! :D And it helped me to be able to separate movement from exercise, and yet connect them. I started thinking musically. <smile> That is what us musician’s do best. So –

A “movement” in music is any (contains any) of the principal divisions of a symphony, sonata or other composition (piece/song), such as:

a)tempo
b)rhythm
c)timbre/tone
d)melody
e)harmony
f)volume
g)consonance/dissonance
h)scales/time signatures/key signatures
i)accent/beat/meter
j)phrasing
k)chords/intervals
l)rests/the space between notes (brought to my attention as I forgot this one, LOL!)

Now in order to create a movement and thus a symphony, each one of these separate divisions I just listed must be learned. They must be learned separately. I could never have mastered them all at once, whew! It took me a lot of time to learn each one, how it worked, how to use it, etc. And I continue to build on them all the time. To try to create a symphony without this process, well, it would be impossible.

And a symphony by definition is:

A harmony of sounds, a harmony of any kind; and in music it is an extended composition in which there are movements related in subject, but varying in form and execution.

So I can very plainly see “movement through CST” as an analogy of the divisions contained in a “movement of music”. It is the “movement” that creates the “symphony” and not the opposite, just as it is the “movement” of CST that can create the “symphony” of my body flowing into “exercise” (symphonic movement) in the most harmonious fashion possible; True harmony.

As I mentioned I had forgotten to add “rests” into my list of divisions of musical movement. This is interesting as I used to be an exercise addict, and resting was unheard of, LOL! Scott brought it up by saying:

“Here’s one for you Patti: As you probably know, Claude Debussy said, “Music is the space between notes.” How would you describe this as it applies to your metaphor of symphonic movement?”

I thought on this and Maggi brought up the idea of “rests”. So I thought, since rests (written spaces where there is no sound in music) are a division of a movement of a symphony, resting is not only just as important as movement, it is a piece of it, and without it the movement is incomplete.

Scott replied, “You mean symphony in movement and nutrition involve Start, Stop, Wait?” :wink:

Connie had something to add to this too! She said, “You know what else? In pipe music if the rests/holds are not right the whole thing falls apart. We call it the train wreck. And get this – the hardest note to play in all of pipe music is the longest one. Everybody wants to shorten it and rush off to the next sparkly notes and it blows up the tune!” :shock:

Scott replied, “That’s funny Connie. People who cannot rest/recover properly in training, I call “train wrecks” too!

As we continued discussing “resting” in movement, Ann Margaret shared something that was just awesome! She said, “Okay you guys, I am going to push this music metaphor even further. The rests in music are not just silence in-between notes (although they are certainly that too); they are also breaths, both for the audience and the musician. They are also spaces that allow for a lot of drama and thought to occur. Rests are definitely rhythmic, but they also build tension in a piece and help its release; they suspend . . . and resolve; they float and diminish. Rests (breaths) create the structure of a piece as surely as all the other things Patti listed. But to borrow/adapt Scott’s phrase – “they breathe the music”.
Now think of this in terms of the discussion about tension. In the same way, breaths in-between/during movements aid in the release of tension, the evocation of emotions; movement creates the feeling of floating, that when ended, evokes the same contented sigh as the conclusion of a well played air or lament. And in the same way as the musician who does not breathe into a difficult passage experiences Connie’s train wreck, the mover who does not breathe into those areas of tension creates more tension and injury.”


Connie then replied: “This got me thinking about the impact of rest on performance. For dance music on the pipes, the “idiom” depends on tension vs. rest. Take a march, if the timing is right you start tapping your feet. Same with a jig, if the rhythm is there you start jigging. It’s not a jig, just a collection of notes, if the tension/release is out of whack.
Back in my linear dumbbell days I knew intellectually why we were not supposed to let momentum take over, but way back in the back of my head I was thinking, but it sure would be fun to swing…Yesterday at a traffic light I was doing Egyptian neck slides to the beat on the radio and boy was it different than in the ladies room at work with no music.”

I’m sure there is so much more that we can relate here, and I appreciated Scott’s, Connie’s, Maggi's, and Ann Margaret’s contributions. Exercise only as a form of burning calories or making muscle has now been wonderfully reframed for me. When I now do my 5 minutes of CST movement (which now holds much value to me), I feel I am contributing to something really wonderful within myself. And my only request is this: “Make ME a symphony”. Through CST movement (symphonic movement) I feel this happening.

Patti.

mushtaq
06-05-2004, 09:58 PM
Absolutely brilliant!!

This is one of those posts where I sit down think about it then have to go back and read it again.

Thanks

Mushtaq Ali

Pattimeow
06-06-2004, 02:17 PM
I love the thoughts flowing through me about how music relateds to CST™ movement. Thinking about how a "sound envelope" relates:

Very few sounds in nature have a constant volume or amplitude. A sound usually takes awhile to get up to full energy and then, after lasting awhile, some time to wind down. This distribution of energy over time is called the sound's "envelope". the shape of the envelope can give a very characteristic quality to the sound itself. Compare for instance, the sound of a gun to that of a gong. The gunshot has a very abrupt beginning and a very quick decay after the shot is fired. The gong by contrast, has a very slow attack as the gong warms up, and sound decays very slowly after the loudest volume is reached.
I think in my exercise addiction days I was more like a gunshot, LOL!

Anyway, I was thinking about our "movment envelope" and how it too takes awhile to get up to full energy and then after lasting awhile, some time to wind down. And I love the thought of this distribution of energy over time creating our "movement envelope", and that the shape (4 stages: attack, decay, sustain, and release) of this envelope can, like sounds, give a very characteristic quality to the movement itself.
I wish I could chart a sound envelope for you to see, but let me explain it in an analogy form:

Imagine a wave approaching the seashore: as it begins to raise itself and get to its "peak" this is the "attack", as it breaks, this is the beginning of the "decay", and as it rumbles towards shore this is its "sustain", and as it diminishes on shore this is it's "release". A perfect image of a "sound/movement envelope". I love it!

Just sharing,
Patti :D

Claire
06-13-2004, 03:37 PM
Patti,
I LOVE this! Thank you so much for thinking this through and posting it.
Claire

Connie Brown
06-13-2004, 03:54 PM
I agree Claire and I already used this idea to refine some movement!

Patti you will like this. I changed the "movement envelope" on those lumbar circles that made me nauseous. I softened the attack, leveled out the decay, and increased the sustain all at a softer volume.

attack = how fast to launch into the exercise
decay = rate of change of movement, 0 = completely even & steady
sustain = how long it takes to complete a rep
volume = how far to the extreme to take the ROM
release = end of the rep

Fer instance, with the WW Intermediate "spine circles," take the one where you bend forward, to the side, to the back, and upright again.

To soften the attack, I bent gently and kept my head up. Before I just jolted down, face down, to get it over with.

To level out the decay, I made sure the pace was the same all the way around. Before, I think it was down-fast, creak around to the side, back-get-stuck-for-a-sec, then up fast to get it over with. my, my.

To change the sustain, since I made the whole rep the same speed as my slowest part, which was going around the side and coming up from back, it took longer.

To reduce the volume, I didn't go as far down as I could have maybe. Before, I was going as far out as I could moving through the rep and some places I can go farther than others so it was uneven. This was smoothing it out. Also keeping my head sort of upright felt like turning down the volume.

And imagine this - upon release of the rep it felt good instead of nauseating. :)

It was REALLY fun to manipulate the variables this way and i found out two things: 1, it is the rate of change of position off vertical that causes problems, and 2, it takes more muscle strength to go slow enough to stay under the radar of nausea.

After a couple of days of this I now am enjoying these circles and enjoying recovering the movement. WOW!

thanks for this metaphor Patti!

Scott Sonnon
06-13-2004, 03:56 PM
Connie and Patti,
Would you two be willing to co-author an article on this for CST MAG? It would help a great many people, for sure!

Randell Waddell
06-13-2004, 04:08 PM
The metaphors you suggest are wonderful.

Cheers
Randell :D

Connie Brown
06-15-2004, 09:39 AM
I thought of another musical parallel. (another chapter of, everything I know about training shows up in a pipe band) Now this is for a complex instrument and even that is nowhere near the complexity of our bodies.

This one is about fine tuning.

- it takes years to learn and thousands of reps

- you go from discerning the big deltas and then the tiny ones

- you have to do it every day

- it is specific to the player, the instrument, the environment, and the use

Taking years to learn:

This is for a bagpipe which has 4 reeds, that most fickle and responsive of sound sources. First off, you have to learn the 'base' note in the 'voice' of three kinds of reeds: chanter, tenor drone, bass drone. They sound different. That takes a while. Then you learn all the interactions of the base note: what does it sound like when 2 are on, and 1 is off? 2 off, 1 on? repeat for all combinations. That takes a while. Then you listen for the match of the 9 melody notes with the drones. Basically it is 11 factorial number of combinations... it takes time to train your ear to hear ALL of them.

Similiarly in training, what a lot of 'notes' there are in our bodies! and think of the interactions!

Discerning from Big Differences to Small Ones

Once you have the main notes down, you can quickly isolate them and bring them in tune. THEN you start to listen for the overtones. The bass drone alone has 5 or 6 that a master can hear. (these are the faint resonating tones higher than the main note; sort of like the 2d rainbow for a really strong rainbow) EACH of those overtones interacts with the other drones and the melody notes. I have seen a master tuning his bass drone so that the 2d overtone matches the C on his chanter, stuff like that.

On the food side I saw this in my logs. At first I saw BIG emotions or the ones that hit me in the face. After the big ones quiet down I can see more refined ones. In the time slot between meals I can now distinguish the different kinds of hunger (blood sugar, serotonin, BE) and thirst where I couldn't when I started - everything just felt off.

Doing It Every Day

Reeds respond to temperature, pressure, and humidity, as does the rest of the instrument. Also reeds get old and lose their vibrations. And the blowing comes from the strength and energy of the player. Daily attention to the state of these things is absolutely necessary. Otherwise you might get drifts and degradations that get so big while you are not paying attention, that it is VERY hard to bring the darn thing back into balance.

Same with training. The more time off, the more cruft accumulates that then needs to be sorted out.

Specific to the Player, The Use, The Instrument

Even after you learn fine tuning in general, you have to learn it brand-new every day with your own instrument, or if you get a new one, you have to figure out what it does. Every combo of reed, pipe, and piper makes a unique sound. Even a master cannot pick up a new pipe and know it instantly. Even a master will need to do hundreds of "reps" with an unfamiliar instrument to learn how it responds and what it sounds like. Course they will pick it up and have it sounding good in minutes; but the fine tuning still takes time.

With training the parallel is that our instrument keeps changing on us too! a new day, new challenges, new movement make a new sound that needs to be checked out.

(is Patti the only one that got this far? hiya sweetie!)

Cheers

Scott Sonnon
06-15-2004, 09:53 AM
Beautiful, Connie. I love where you're going with this!

Pattimeow
06-15-2004, 10:29 AM
Connie,
You're on a roll, or is that a reed, LOL. This is great! I love it!



Connie and Patti,
Would you two be willing to co-author an article on this for CST™ MAG? It would help a great many people, for sure!

Scott,
Well thank you for the vote of confidence. It spooked me though! I have no idea how to "write" let alone an "article", but I know Connie is super at it. Connie would you like to take this on? :wink:

Love you both,
Patti

Connie Brown
06-15-2004, 10:37 AM
Nice try Patti, no I won't do it alone, she said smiling. If Scott asked both of us he has a reason however nefarious.

But think of this. We have 3 weeks at least. Really all it is is cutting and pasting what we already did into a Word file, then letting it sit for a couple of days and look at it again to refine it or add something.

We can do it in baby steps.

Another neat thing is, Scott's magazine is for and by all of us "explorers" so it is more like sharing our thoughts instead of thinking we have to have something all that great that it is worth putting in stone first.

As i have heard before = exhale, baby steps, our buds will help!

CeceEllen
06-15-2004, 05:35 PM
Hey Patti and Connie!

I really love this thread... I am all about your metaphor!! :D Thanks for sharing this... and I look forward to reading the article!!

Love,
C: )

Pattimeow
06-15-2004, 07:40 PM
Nice try Patti, no I won't do it alone, she said smiling. If Scott asked both of us he has a reason however nefarious.

Okay. I guess we would do this via emailing each other?

Patti

Connie Brown
06-15-2004, 09:12 PM
Sure. i will start tomorrow when I am more mentally fresh. :wink: