PDA

View Full Version : UDS lite review


David Whitley, RKC
11-20-2003, 10:39 PM
I finished my first read of UDS lite today, so as promised here is my review:

First, i really like Dr.Ellis's style of writing. I have said before that it reminds me a little of Mike Mentzer. (who was wrong about a lot of stuff, but presented his material very well) When Dr. Ellis says that the answer to "Why am i fat?" is "you eat more than you think & don't exercise enough" it makes me smile. After having heard thru the years all the excuses( & making quite a few myself), slow metabolism, hormones, genetics, emotional eating 'cause you got picked on in 3rd grade, lack of will power, ad nauseum, it is very refreshing to have someone in a book tell the simple, Newtonian truth. It was a revelation to me that for years i had been working against my own biology due to confusion & misinformation.

I have an idea for an article that i may write comparing & contrasting Ellis with Clarence Bass. Despite Bass' low-fat approach, the two of them have several parallels.
-Calories count
-Exercise is important
-goal setting, progress measuring & sustainability of the program are crucial.

i also learned some very useful stuff about metabolic adaptations & the ratio of fat to lbm as weight is lost and that i am probably guilty of under-reporting my calorie intake.

What i didn't like:
-The Caltrac sales pitch.
-The lack of a bibliography to the studies he refers to. (is this in UDS big?)

Overall very informative, enjoyable & practical.

11-21-2003, 05:17 AM
Dave,

The UDS big has more references - for whatever that's worth. Article sounds interesting. The angle of comparing them on a more sophistacted level, not just low fat v. high fat.

I think the big difference between Bass and Ellis -other then the obvious -is the amount of discipline. Bass's plan takes a lot of planning each day and a lot of , well, discipline.

Once your fat adapted I don't think there's really alot of planning or depriving necessary. Could just be my perspective which is why the article would be interesting. Feel free to run it by me if you want.

Bill